From what side has the violence always come? Who are the real thugs, criminals, and “eco-terrorists”? Who is naive enough to think education and legislation can wrest the earth from the grip of unconscionable bloodthirsty corporates, and their client states, armies, and mercenaries? Who still thinks this struggle does not deserve to be called a fucking war? Who believes that activists, indigenous peoples do not have, and should not exercise the right to defend animals and the earth by any means necessary, including armed struggle and guerilla warfare against the corporations shredding this planet and its life forms right before our eyes? Who has not figured out yet what is happening, what is at stake, and how the politics of nature (over control of scarce resources and animal slaughter for profit) is emerging as the most decisive struggles of all? Who still thinks that only love can conquer hate, only light can dispel darkness, rather than realizing only fierce resistance and revolutionary counter-violence can stop implacable planetary omnicide? That Gandhian tactics mostly inapplicable in the Western world are suicidal in the forests of Brazil?


Guardian, Monday June 18, 2012

Death toll of campaigners involved in protection of forests, rivers and land has almost doubled in three years.



Amazon rainforest activists José Cláudio Ribeiro da Silva and Maria do Espirito Santo, who were murdered last year.


 The struggle for the world’s remaining natural resources is becoming more murderous, according to a new report that reveals that environmental activists were killed at the rate of more than two a week in 2011.

The death toll of campaigners, community leaders and journalists involved in the protection of forests, rivers and land has risen dramatically in the past three years, said Global Witness.

Brazil – the host of the Rio+20 conference on sustainable development – has the worst record for danger in a decade that has seen the deaths of more than 737 defenders, said the briefing, which was released on the eve of the high-level segment of the Earth Summit.

The group called on the leaders at Rio to set up systems to monitor and counter the rising violence, which in many cases involves governments and foreign corporations, and to reduce the consumption pressures that are driving development into remote areas.

“This trend points to the increasingly fierce global battle for resources, and represents the sharpest of wake-up calls for delegates in Rio,” said Billy Kyte, campaigner at Global Witness.

The group acknowledges that their results are incomplete and skewed towards certain countries because information is fragmented and often missing. This means the toll is likely to be higher than their findings, which did not include deaths related to cross-border conflicts prompted by competition for natural resources, and fighting over gas and oil.

Brazil recorded almost half of the killings worldwide, the majority of which were connected to illegal forest clearance by loggers and farmers in the Amazon and other remote areas, often described as the “wild west”.

Among the recent high-profile cases were the murders last year of two high-profile Amazon activists, José Cláudio Ribeiro da Silva and Maria do Espirito Santo. Such are the risks that dozens of other activists and informers are now under state protection.

Unlike most countries on the list, however, the number of killings in Brazil declined slightly last year, perhaps because the government is making a greater effort to intervene in deforestation cases.

The reverse trend is apparent in the Philippines, where four activists were killed last month, prompting the Kalikasan People’s Network for Environment to talk of “bloody May”.

Though Brazil, Peru and Colombia have reported high rates of killing in the past 10 years, this is partly because they are relatively transparent about the problem thanks to strong civil society groups, media organisations and church groups – notably the Catholic Land Commission in Brazil – which can monitor such crimes. Under-reporting is thought likely in China and Central Asia, which have more closed systems, said the report. The full picture has still to emerge.

Last December, the UN special rapporteur on human rights noted: “Defenders working on land and environmental issues in connection with extractive industries and construction and development projects in the Americas … face the highest risk of death as result of their human rights activities.”

Also see: “Killings of environmentalists appear on rise; conflict over shrinking resources intensifies,” The Washington Post, June 20, 2012